Phillips Nizer LLP | Sophisticated Legal Service | News & Media
This links to the home page
News & Media

For media inquiries, please contact Cecilia Peña-Colon at CPena@PhillipsNizer.com
 

In the News View All
  • Video Game Developer Client Dismissed From Federal Lawsuit
    09/25/2024

    Phillips Nizer is pleased to share a recent legal victory for our partner Alan Behr and associates Judith Swartz and Karr Washington. The Federal District Court for the Western District of Washington dismissed all claims against our client, InnoGames,a video game developer.

  • Elliot Wiener Featured in ABA Family Advocate Publication’s Winter Issue
    02/06/2024

    Elliot Wiener, Chair, Phillips Nizer's New York Matrimonial and Family Law practice, was featured in the Winter Issue of the American Bar Association’s publication, Family Advocate, with the article, "Sexual Addiction and Custody Disputes”. 

Recognition & Awards View All
Events and Presentations View All
Publications View All
  • Mark Axinn Published in Habitat Weekly With Article, “Spread Costs Over Time With Strategic Negotiations"
    11/05/2024

    Mark Axinn, Chair, Cooperative and Condominium Practice at Phillips Nizer, was published in Habitat Weekly’s November issue with the article, “Spread Costs Over Time With Strategic Negotiations”, discussing the up-front expenses Co-ops face when leasing to new commercial tenants.

  • ON AGAIN, OFF AGAIN…OFF AGAIN NOW: The FTC’s Non-Compete Rule
    08/27/2024

    On August 20, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas set aside and deemed unlawful and unenforceable the Non-Compete Rule (“Rule”) promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”).  In Ryan LLC v. Federal Trade Commission (“Ryan”), 2024 WL 3879954 (N.D. Texas August 20, 2024), the Court determined that the Rule was violative of the FTC Act, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the Declaratory Judgment Act.  The Court ruled that the FTC “exceeded its statutory authority in implementing the Rule” and further declared the Rule to be “arbitrary and capricious” for being unreasonably overbroad and not reflective of reasonable alternatives.  The Court held that the Rule “shall not be enforced or otherwise take effect on September 4, 2024, or thereafter.”